Blacked Avatars Should Not Be Able to Interact with Scripts in Worn Objects
Jennifer Boyle
I did an experiment with an alt to verify that blocked avatars could not interact with scripts in worn objects. I was shocked to learn that they can. I wore a spanker, blocked my alt, and had them click on the spanker, which responded to the click just the same as if they were not blocked. That was not the expected behavior, and it should not be the intended behavior. Blocked alts should not be able to interact with scripts in objects owned by people who have blocked them even if the objects are not worn.
Log In
Ember Ember
The only way you can disallow anyone from interacting with a scripted object you are wearing is if you blacklist them using a scripted function inside that object. If it doesn't have the option to blacklist people, you're out of luck unless you script it yourself.
Caelan Whimsy
Blocking an avatar is meant to keep
you
from seeing anything they say or send to you (yeah, I know even that's flawed). It's not meant to interfere with them
interacting with anything. So while I understand where you're coming from, I would be surprised if LL took your suggestion.Cuddles Supply
Caelan Whimsy But blocking someone
should
interfere with them interacting with something attached to my AVI. I can' think of a single case where I want someone I blocked interacting with my interactive attachments. Given the diversity of UI elements used to add blocks to attachments, I may or may NOT be successful in blocking a user per attachment. And yes, blocking someone from clicking on my attachments does interfere with someone else's experience. Exactly what we want in this case because when I block someone, my experience
supersedes theirs.Lucia Nightfire
I think you mean "blocked avatars" as "blacked avatars" means something else.
Jennifer Boyle
Lucia Nightfire I did mean "Blocked Avatars," but I can't edit it.