Friend cand edit, delete or take objects.
closed
Science Copperfield
If I'm working with a friend on a project, the options are limited to give them access everything or give them nothing. Why can't this be restricted to a single obect? I really don't want to give anyone full, unrestricted access to everything I have out in the open. I want to give access to an individual object, not everything.
Log In
Spidey Linden
closed
Hello, and thank you for your feature request.
Incoming suggestions are reviewed in the order they are received by a team of Lindens with diverse areas of expertise. We consider a number of factors: Is this change possible? Will it increase lag? Will it break existing content? Is it likely that the number of residents using this feature will justify the time to develop it? This wiki page further describes the reasoning we use: Feature Requests
This particular suggestion, unfortunately, cannot be tackled at this time. However, we regularly review previously deferred suggestions when circumstances change or resources become available.
We are grateful for the time you took to submit this feature request. We hope that you are not discouraged from submitting others in the future. Many excellent ideas to improve Second Life come from you, our residents. We can’t do it alone.
Thank you for your continued commitment to Second Life.
Iza Blossom
If your objects are rezzed under group "ABC" then create a group "XYZ". Create a role within group "XYZ" to allow the group member to manipulate (move, copy and modify) group owned objects. Then whatever object you want edited by another you rez under the "XYZ" group.
Crexon Resident
Iza Blossom This right here. What the OP is looking for already exist with using groups and the group permissions.
RestrainedRaptor Resident
Iza Blossom Although it's frustrating that you'd have to pay L$100 for the privilege of creating a group.
Iza Blossom
RestrainedRaptor Resident Show me a resident who has never earned, purchased or spent a linden in the duration they have been a member of Second Life. It's kind of implied that if you have objects to rez you have either purchased them (with lindens) or created them which also cost lindens to upload textures or the actual meshes. For that matter, most residents already have a personal group they have created at some point in time. The OP wanted a way to allow someone to edit select objects rather than ALL their objects. My answer provided a solution for that.
Juni Ravenwood
Iza Blossom In my opinion, expecting someone to take up group space, just to edit someone's objects is rediculous in itself. Not all of us have or see the need to have a Subscription to SL, which limits our number of groups, an I've been in so many conversations of people having literally no group space left, especially with already having premium. The group idea is flawed, sorry, but I can see this being a nuisance. Asking people to leave existing groups just to edit my objects, is also absurd...
Science Copperfield
Iza Blossom I excersize my right to be spoiled child. I want what I want the way I want it. I don't want a work around. I don't want to make a group just to have more granular control over editing objects. For almost 20 years, there's a checkbox in your contact list. "Friend can take, edit, copy and delete objects". If you check it, everything you own might as well be theirs too. All I want is the same checkbox in the permissions of each object. "Friend can blah blah this object" Not the entirety of everything I have rezzed no matter where it is, but "this object".
Jenna Felton
I also like this idea. I think it can be achieved with a new object property.
First you create a special group of residents. This behaves like a regular group, and has its own key, but you are the owner of the group, no one else can join it themselves and the members of this group can not communicate (otherwise there is little difference to regular groups and when you want to allow communication, you just use a regular group), call it "limited group".
Second you have this object property: A list of keys of instances who have the edit access. The instances can be single residents, limited groups or regular groups. When you only want to give an one person the edit rights, you not need groups but when you want to allow more people to edit your items, you need them, because number of instances will be limited (no blowing up the asset database). Using regular groups just for modify access is overdone, since regular groups can do much more. Thus the introduction of limited groups.
But in contrast of the check box in the friends list, you will have to give access to every single item (or you can select a bunch and then edit the access permission for all of them).
Prisqua Newall
I like this idea too. I think it could be handy.
Dorie Bernstein
This would be fabulous!
Bavid Dailey
I like the idea without having any notion of how to achieve it