Scripting Features

Please implement the equivalent of Python's re.escape() in LSL. This escapes regex metacharacters in a string. Repeatedly attempting this via a UDF consumes too much script timing. Thanks.

The function llInstantMessage can be used to send spam to users as noted here https://feedback.secondlife.com/feature-requests/p/unblockable-instant-message-spam and here https://feedback.secondlife.com/scripting-features/p/feature-request-llinstantmessagenoemail-same-function-as-llinstantmessage-but-do While there are legitimate uses for this function, it is being abused by some to send spam. For example, I get IM via email as a convenience but that also means I get these spam messages too. In particular, region owners are using this message to send IMs only to people who are not logged in making it difficult to put an end to. My suggestion is before this function can be used to send a message to anyone other than the owner of the sending object, the calling object MUST get permission from the recipient first.

We have many ways to Detect if an object is (left) clicked on, but no way to Detect if someone rights clicks on that same object, Why? This would be a very useful feature for the SL Racing Community and vehicle enjoyers as a whole, and I'm sure this could have many other uses for scripters in general. The reason for this request is because of the ability of a resident to effect the movement of a car (or any physical object) even if the object doesn't belong to them by right clicking on the object. I am not talking about a resident that has the person's edit rights, or estate manager of the sim they are on. But someone who has no rights to an object can still effect that object by right clicking on it, (often spamming right clicks) it will either make the object micro stutter slowing it down or out right stopping the object in place for a brief moment. Having a function that can detect a right click, much like you can with a left click, so that a script can tell you who is editing it would be very very helpful! And / Or some kind of tag that would stop physical objects from stopping when right clicked / edited would be really cool too.

Ability to trigger an ‘on_mouseover’ event when the mouse cursor is on a prim side. Used for example to show a floating text or a chat message to get help. The ‘delay’ parameter allows to set a delay in seconds before to execute the action in the event. The ‘link’ parameter return the link number of the prim when the cursor is. The ‘side’ parameter return the side number of the prim when the cursor is.

I'd the ability within LSL, possibly tied to a runtime permission, to be able to adjust the following parcel settings. This would be for moderation, estate management, and event management. Parcel name (string) Parcel description (string) Parcel sale (integer price, key buyer, integer sell_objects_with_land - NULL_KEY for anyone can buy, negative price (or const) to set not for sale. Should always be possible for an object running with estate manager permission, tying this to its own runtime permission for safety would probably be wise) Everyone can: Edit terrain, fly, build, object entry, scripts Group can: build, object entry, scripts Safe (damage) Pushing Show in search (+ category) Adult content Avatars on other parcels can see and chat with avatars on this parcel Landing point (quaternion (x,y,z,rotation) - have const values for blocked TP and anywhere) Snapshot (key texture_id - NULL_KEY for default/unset) Abandon land (Possibly its own runtime permission for safety, should always succeed if owned by an estate manager) Locking these adjustments behind estate manager permissions would be acceptable but not ideal only if absolutely necessary, also completely acceptable would be a reasonable script sleep penalty to prevent unfair use of server resources or abuse. Being able to specify the position or the parcel UUID to act upon for this would be nice to allow for the efficient management of estate regions and large event spaces, possibly with a const to reference the parcel the object resides in currently for convenience in non-centrally managed applications. Any changes that are not authorized would fail and result in an error. This would greatly reduce the reliance on bots / scripted agents which are currently used to accomplish these tasks. Allowing these tasks to be completed totally on-platform would simplify event/venue and estate management dramatically and reduce the load on servers by eliminating the need for bots to idle around waiting to handle these management tasks as needed.

Subject: llDialog Function Not Displaying Menu Correctly - List Argument Being Misinterpreted Problem Description: My LSL script is intended to display a menu dialog using llDialog. While the llDialog function appears to be called successfully (confirmed by debug messages), the menu window does not pop up for the user. Analysis of the debug logs strongly suggests that the list menu argument passed to llDialog is being misinterpreted by the LSL compiler or the server-side system. Observed Behavior (from Debug Logs): Despite the list menu variable being defined in the script with the correct LSL list syntax (e.g., list menu = ["Item1", "Item2", "Item3"];), the debug output for the llDialog call shows the menu argument as a concatenated string without list delimiters ([]) or element separators (,). Example Debug Log Line: (Note: The menuText field below shows an example, but the core issue is the menu argument.) [04:27] [HAYSURIZA] Glasses Boston2 B&T(Lel Lady): B-SCRIPT DEBUG: Calling llDialog with: id='513ab74d-b9ab-9dd9-3516-4edd077e733a', menuText='Switch :On head ：頭のせ\nStyle mode :Style Choose:スタイルを選ぶ\nSpecularRim :Reflected Rm on/off:リムの反射\nLens Select :Choose lens ：レンズを選ぶ\nfullbright :Fullbright :フルブライト有無\nReSize :Size :サイズ調整', menu=fullnrightcloseresizestele modespecularlens listswitch, CHANNEL=1573325313 As seen in menu=fullnrightcloseresizestele modespecularlens listswitch, the list is not properly parsed into elements. Expected Behavior: The menu argument in the llDialog call should be recognized as a proper LSL list, enclosed in square brackets [] with elements separated by commas , (e.g., menu=[fullbright, CLOSE, ReSize, ...]). This should then result in the menu dialog appearing for the user. Steps Already Taken to Troubleshoot: string menuText Formatting: Corrected all full-width spaces to half-width spaces and ensured correct line breaks (\n) in menuText variables (menuText, menuText2, menuText3). list menu Formatting: Initially, ensured list menu = ["Item1", "Item2", ...]; followed correct LSL syntax (double quotes for strings, commas as separators, square brackets for the list). Attempted manual re-typing of the list menu line in the LSL editor to eliminate any invisible/corrupt characters from copy-pasting. This temporarily showed the list correctly in one debug log, but subsequent attempts reverted to the incorrect concatenated string. New Script Creation: Created a brand-new script and copied all code into it, including re-typing the list menu line, but the issue persisted. Script Reset: Repeatedly reset the script after every code change. Viewer Cache: Cleared viewer cache multiple times. Conclusion: Given that the LSL syntax for list menu appears correct in the editor, and debug logs show the llDialog call but with a malformed menu argument, this suggests an issue beyond simple script syntax errors. It points towards a potential problem with the LSL editor's file handling/encoding, or the server-side LSL compiler's parsing of the script, rather than a bug in the LSL script itself. Viewer Information: Please specify your Second Life viewer (e.g., "Official Second Life Viewer,") and its exact version number. my Operating System (e.g., "Windows 10," ).

At the last Server User Group meeting, there was discussion of removing the pathfinding system from Second Life. This would break my NPCs, so I'm not too happy about this. I don't need full pathfinding, though; just something comparable to llGetStaticPath to do route planning. I never turn on full SL pathfinding. I just use the static navmesh. Things which do that don't show up as active pathfinding objects. There are now good open source navmesh generators. See https://github.com/recastnavigation/recastnavigation as an example. That's probably better than the old Havok pathfinding engine. If we're going to have AI characters in SL, whether they are avatars or animesh, they need some kind of navigation system so they can move through the world. Otherwise they are boring. SL ought to have some solution in this space. This needs further discussion. Comments?

From Inara Pey:- https://modemworld.me/2025/06/07/2025-week-23-sl-tpvd-meeting-summary/ "Signal Linden requested feedback on the idea of deprecating and removing Navmesh characters / llCreateCharacter (i.e. Pathfinding)." Here is my feedback:- I am getting the impression LL intends to remove all pathfinding functionality from simulators including the creation of navmesh and LSL functionality like llGetStaticPath I spent much of last year designing and putting together NPC's for my sim including scripting systems that use LSL pathfinding functionality, and spent a lot of time setting up my sim to generate good navmeshes. I will be very upset if this feature is just straight up removed. I can't keep investing my time in pioneering technology in SL if LL are not going to commit to maintaining the technology it implements and destroying my creations at random. I understand the need to transition, but basic pathfinding functionality should be maintained. I do not want to log in one day and find all of my work broken after all of the time and money invested.

Use cases : make debugging easier for scripters structuring correctly their code with flags to enable / disable testing portions of code in spite of doing it manually with comments or copy / paste configure scripts to be dynamically optimized for a build configuration, though relying on one main script that scripters can upgrade with time and as they get better skilled etc. It is basically a free and open source feature from the C/C++ boost library https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_59_0/libs/preprocessor/doc/index.html (already existing into the Firestorm viewer). Anyway it is a feature needed by any serious scripter who wants to maintain code efficiently in the long term BTW making more efficient code also means using less cpu on LL servers.

Currently you can only take llDamage in damage enabled parcels. Obviously this is ideal to keep players who do not want to take damage or die safe, but could you add an opt in option to choose to allow damage to affect your avatar at all times anywhere while enabled? This would mean that players could "turn on PVP" and engage in damage systems anywhere in SL, on any parcel, opening a huge amount of potential for combat focused communities to expand. Those that leave this "PVP Mode" disabled would not be affected by this change at all, and would remain safe unless they chose to toggle it on and jump into the action. Maybe avatars with PVP enabled would display it above their name and group tag, for example: (PVP) ECHELON Grave Maybe a PVP enabled avatar dot on the minimap would have a small additional red ring around the dot.