Web/Marketplace Features

Related items listing in Marketplace should be checkboxes to be able to select all 8 wanted in the one function, not click one or two or three if you are fast enough, to then get kicked out and have to go back in and repeat the steps over and over, if anyone has any kind of mobility limitations the way it is currently makes it problematic. EDIT : This is for listing the items for purchase, not for purchasing items.

I'd like to see a creation date of items shown in the marketplace and the ability to search by year created.

It would be amazing to be able to block a store's content from showing in Marketplace. Instead of adding a store as a favorite you could click to add store to a blocked list and then their content would no longer show in your search results.

Issue: Recently Gifts purchased n MP have not been delivering, so the recipient says. Either the item is not delivered. Or they mindlessly clear the dialog (cancal or ignore). Or they don't know where the item went. and thus requires follow-up to see if they don't know what's going and, click accept but don't know where items are received. This leads to awkward interactions like gifting someone something, not getting thank you, asking about only to find out it wasn't delivered. I'm socially awkward enough without help! ;-) Suggestion: show on the order page of the item was delivered to the recipients inventory or not. Rather than show if the gift was Declined, just show non-delivery. Assumption: I assume users can't buy gifts for people who have blocked them and thus the likelihood of abuse can minimized. If they can buy gifts for people who have blocked them, I can write up a new feature request! :-)

Once I click "Add To Favorites" the link then becomes unclickable and says "Added as favorite". The link should remain clickable but become a "Remove from favorite" link instead. Then I won't have to dig through 30+ pages of favorites that added up over time to delete it from the favorites list.

Let's invent a label - something simple, like "GenAI was used in whole or part in this object's manufacture" and then /require/ creators/vendors to label all of their relevant sales items with it. Let this label also be a tag or flag as part of an object's or sales vendor's properties, so that Residents don't have to struggle to know if an object is GenAI-"containing." Let this also be a tag or flag on the MP and in any other searchable interface where it makes sense to exist, so that Residents may include or exclude GenAI items in their search results. GenAI is not going anywhere. The ethics of its use are a separate matter. But Residents have a right to be informed of the tool's use in the creation of their purchased items, just as we have a right to know whether a food IRL has been genetically modified. Let Residents be advised of the use of GenAI to create purchasable goods, and thereby purchase according to their own preference. Please disregard, and accept my apology, if this issue has already been discussed/addressed. Thank you.

Marketplace images are limited to 700x525 pixels. This really needs to be increased so we can actually see what we're buying.

I'd like to request the return of the beginning and ending balances on the monthly Account History / Statements for the Tilia Wallet. This feature was incredibly helpful for many of us who use these statements for accounting and financial tracking purposes. Personally, I rely on this information to reconcile my monthly ins and outs, just like I would with a regular bank or PayPal statement. It provided a clear snapshot of what I started the month with and what I ended with, which made tracking and reporting much easier — especially during tax season or when organizing business finances. In addition to the beginning/ending balances, cashout amounts and associated fees have also been removed, which further limits the usefulness of the current statement. Right now, all we can see are Lindex transactions (L$ we sold) and services we bought in Linden Dollars, which doesn’t give a full picture of actual money movement or wallet balance over time. Another important point: the website and PDF versions of the statements often don’t match, which causes confusion. For example, when I pay for land fees or services using funds from my Tilia Wallet, the website clearly states that the payment was made with Tilia wallet — but the PDF doesn't show this detail, making it unclear how the payment was made. The same issue happens with PayPal payments for services. The website shows the paypal accounts email it was paid with but the PDF has zero info on what account I used to pay with. Since many of us rely on the PDF as an official receipt, it really needs to reflect all the same payment details shown on the website. The previous format was much more complete and reliable for those of us treating this as a serious financial tool. Please consider reinstating these features and improving consistency between the web and PDF views. Thanks for listening!

Please add a required bool while creating a Marketplace listing that asks the creator to disclose if AI generative tools were used in part/all of the products creation. Add this bool to the 'Do Not Show' section of the Marketplace search filter. Allow listings to be reported if they do not honestly disclose this. ---- For the health of the market we need the use of AI tools to be disclosed by creators. I would prefer personally that no AI generation be supported. I understand that tolorance of it is an effort to avoid censorships slippery slope, and is complicated by the sheer variation of AI tools that currently exist. But regardless of opinions or complications, it's existance cannot be ignored. So lets focus on what can be done, by giving some power of choice to the consumer instead. Users should be provided a way to choose products with or without AI generation while shopping, and naturally creators who choose not to disclose or to lie should face the same reportability and moderation as any other creator that would choose to lie while listing. The moderation half of this should not necessarily focus on trying to prove the use of AI gen tools, it doesn't actually need to. Creators who have done the work to provide support and actually prepare the AI generated content for its use in SL are unlikely to warrent being reported, and should not need to lie about the useage anyway. It is products that blatantly lack support, have egregious LOD & LI values that would be inclined to lie, and would want to be reported by users, this is the same for ANY product currently listed. If you buy it, and you don't get what was described, it should be reportable, the same goes for AI generated products, AI generated should not get a pass because you have to 'prove' something first, when the fact remains that you didn't get what thought you bought. So do not focus on "did you use a tool?" focus on "can you fix & support the product?" If it can't be supported, then disclose it was made via AI generation and move on. This is a similar complication to full perm and gacha resales, but also ripped models, copybot etc, in they will all lack support due to not being made directly by the creator of the listing. There is a big difference between fullperm & gacha resale vs ripping & botting, and that difference is honest disclosure.

When mesh came out, marketplace added the ability to state whether a item was "No Mesh", "Partial Mesh", or "100% mesh", as well if it is fitted mesh. I propose that with the addition of PBR, it is made so we can see if something is using PBR with "No PBR", "Partial PBR", "100% PBR", as well as a flag called "Blinn-phong Fallbacks" (MAYBE? Since some people will be using non-PBR viewers apparently). This will benefit creators and buyers in the following ways: Buyers will know if content is using PBR or blinn-phong. Creators will be able to clearly disclaim in a visible, uniform way that something has PBR without fallbacks. Buyers who use old viewers will know if content will be compatible with their viewer. It would be useful if this is a searchable filter too!