✨ Feature Requests

I suggest adding optional semantic license flags in addition to mod, copy, transfer so that creators can indicate their license terms alongside permissions. For example, textures are distributed full perms, but that doesnt mean you can do what you like with a texture if there are additional license terms. Often licensing information is in a notecard which can get lost or deleted. Possible licensing flags might include: NONCOMMERCIAL: Free to use, but not for commercial purposes EDUCATIONAL_USE: Free for teaching or sandbox use EXPORT_OK: May be used outside Second Life ATTRIBUTION_REQUIRED: Must credit the creator SEE_PROFILE: License terms available in creator’s profile A creator could set some or all of these license flags for their items. Ideally these flags wouldnt need a change to the existing data structures (assuming mod,copy,transfer are stored as a single integer). They wouldnt affect existing items, they wouldnt change mod, copy, trans permissions, and they wouldnt be enforced via software. They would be for information only, added to the item by the creator so anyone can check for terms if they look at an object's profile.

I would like to suggest an improvement to user privacy in Second Life. Currently, even after blocking someone, it is still possible for them to track or identify a user through old items, Note cards. Old Calling Cards or photos that were shared in the past. This happens because blocked users can still see the user’s current username and display name on that old content and can still access their profile. Even changing a username does not prevent this, since those references continue to link back to the same profile. Blocking mainly stops direct interaction, but it does not remove access to previously shared content. To improve user safety, I suggest the following feature: When a user is blocked, any items, photos, or other shared content that display the blocker’s name should have that name removed or replaced with “Unknown” in the metadata. This would prevent blocked users from identifying or tracking someone through old content. Implementing this change would give users stronger control over their privacy and provide better protection against harassment or stalking.

this request is a 2 parter 1: Add "Auto-Return group objects" to region options. 2:Add "Exempt from auto return on group land" to role permissions in Groups This will make it so in a land group you can have the "everyone" role's items returned but have "renter" or "staff" role items unaffected

Some Experiences become active on our accounts without explicit request or permission. These are often linked to Gateways or Events and remain attached even after the event has ended or we never return to the Gateway. Currently, there is no option to revoke or forget these experiences. I propose that users be given the ability to opt out and fully forget any experience they did not explicitly choose, ensuring greater autonomy and control over our digital presence.

It would be highly beneficial if, in Second Life, blocking a user also prevented their account from accessing our profile content. A profile can contain a wide range of personal information, such as group affiliations, interests, or even sensitive descriptions. If someone with malicious intent can still view this information after being blocked, they could use it to continue harassment, intimidation, or stalking outside of direct in-world interactions. Preventing blocked users from seeing profile content would therefore significantly increase user safety and privacy, ensuring that blocking is a truly effective protective measure.

Lindem lab needs to work on a way to close the code and protect creators, many are losing their products to copybooth. Creators need to be protected before any other updates! We create and keep the sl alive, without us the sl is nothing. But many of us are insecure and feel injured all the time, and LL does nothing even when we offer proof. I have a natural rights process that I never had a response to, it's been two years, even though it's premium plus. We have no support and protection! Work on ways to prevent the mesh from being copied, and exported out of the game without being the product owner. Many buy the demo and even though it has a script not to throw it on the floor and the product only lasts 5 minutes, they still manage to steal from us. Hair, skins, textures, mesh... everything is stolen, there is no area that we feel protected. What work does LL do to protect creators?

Aviation in Second life can be a deeply frustrating experience. The other big issue besides unlimited-height security orbs is no object entry parcels. Unlike ban lines, no object entry applies to the parcel at all altitudes. If you encounter a no-object-entry parcel, your vehicle stops immediately, and its physics are altered to remove any motion or forces applied to it. The practical effect of this is that an airplane stops in midair, and there's no way to get it flying again: even editing it so that it would move away from the no-entry parcel just makes it hang in midair, so you wind up having to unsit and delete it. As with security orbs, there's no way to know in advance that you're about to have this problem. I would like to see the no object entry attribute limited to the same effective height as ban lines. Ban lines can be seen in advance and avoided at altitudes where they are effective (especially with some third party viewers that show nearby banned parcels on the minimap). If I'm flying above the ban line height limit, this would no longer be an issue with that change in place.

There is a vast amount of content available where the object itself is modifiable, but the scripts or other content it contains are no mod. It is possible to rename such objects or change their description by rezzing them in world, renaming and then taking back into inventory. It is not possible however to rename the same objects directly in inventory, or when attached. This limitation makes the process of renaming modify objects unnecessarily difficult.

I was estate manager for SL Multiverse Fair the past few days and ran across a griefer that was using an html text to voice generator script to send voice across the event. These were in very short bursts with a lot of random inappropriate comments. We saw the URL that was doing it but locating what prim it was took a very long time. We could have stopped it quickly if there was a method to have a URL Block list at Estate Level

I propose adding an object-wide flag that can be set even for no-mod items (similar to the "for sale" bit and other status flags), which prevents textures from rendering as full bright. (This feature is misused so often that it would be nice to be able to disable it at the land level, too.) Frankly, this is a plague on SL. Any time you have an area with multiple creators, somebody has to play the "full bright police" and nag everyone else to remove all the full bright items from their builds. Even worse, no-mod items are sold on the marketplace with full-bright textures. Why would any possibly want a glow-in-the-dark painting? Who knows! But people still sell no-mod artwork with full-bright textures, and when the item is photographed at precisely the right angle and time of day, there's no way to tell. I get it: there are a few cases where you really do want full bright textures, like a light bulb, computer screen, or something else that produces its own light. But these are so rare that the majority of full-bright textures are just visual litter. They aren't wanted by the people seeing them, and in the no-mod case, they usually aren't wanted by people placing the objects either!